“Are we all bigots?” Only if you don’t know the meaning of the word.

There was some (small) buzz a few weeks ago over Morgan Freeman repeatedly using the word “bigot” on his TV show (“Into the Wormhole” on the Science Channel). The attention largely focused on the statement “Are we all bigots?” and the suggestion that all humans are somehow inherently hardwired to be bigoted.

My immediate thought was “well, that’s a good way to get attention and possibly ratings” — by saying something provocative and charged about race at a moment when race issues are at the front of the public’s consciousness. It’s safe to assume that Science Channel’s viewer demographic is slightly older (available data show that a plurality of its audience is in the 35-54 range), male (68%) and probably whiter, so a comment like this might attract more attention than in other outlets. This is also their top-rated show.

If you don’t click for more, are you a bigot?

Posted in Culture, Language, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

That Origin of Bogus? It’s Probably Bogus.

I’m old enough to remember when the word “bogus” was at the fringe of colloquial English, a slang term that few respectable people would consider using. Of course, it shouldered its way into the circle around the campfire of “acceptable use” some time ago. But when I recently heard it used by a sitting member of Congress, it got me thinking: where did this word come from and, if there’s a particular moment, when did it come in from the cold?

It will be totally bogus if you don’t click here

Posted in Language, Things you should know, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Stationary stationery, revisited

One means not moving. The other is something you write on. I’ve discussed these words before (close to two years ago).

But before this week, this was an error that didn’t worry me much. I know the difference and I’m careful to get it right. When I’ve encountered it while doing work for others it’s been a simple spelling error: I correct it and move on. I’ve never had a situation where the actual meaning of the word was ambiguous.

Until this week.

As a freelance writer and editor, I work with many different kinds of clients over a broad range of services and businesses. The vast majority are small businesses and individuals, but I do a small amount of work with a national merchandising company, which in turn does most of its business with a major national retail store (both of which shall remain unnamed). This sometimes includes reviewing forms used by merchandising reps before and after store service calls.

One of the online post-service reports for a particular product included two questions involving stationery (or stationary — I’ve kept all spellings from the original).

To the question “Where did you place the product?” the rep was to choose from several options, including “Front of Store, Check Lane Endcap, Stationary Front End Cap, and Endcap (Other).” Putting aside the inconsistent use of “endcap” (two words or a compound?), “stationary” immediately raised a flag. The store has a stationery section. But it also has multiple styles of endcap, including ones that are fixed (stationary) and ones that are on wheels (non-stationary). From only this question, it’s not clear which was meant.

A later question asked the rep to note the footage (that’s retail-speak for shelf space) filled by the product. Among the fields to complete is Stationery front end cap”.

Now wait a minute, I thought: What are they talking about here? Those fixed endcaps, not the moveable ones? Or do they mean the section of the store? In the past, products from this supplier have been set in the stationery section (near pens, paper, and other office products). But they’ve also been set in numerous other locations. Which were they describing?

Conceivably, they could have been talking about both (allowing for a different context for each of those questions). There was really no way to tell from the material at hand. Fortunately, I was able to pull older documentation for this project and discovered that the directive did, indeed, refer consistently to the “stationery” section (although, to add to the entertainment, this was prominently misspelled “stationary” in the most widely circulated memo, sent to between 3600 and 4000 people). The older documents resolved the problem…and only just before this potentially confusing item was rolled out to over 1500 reps (who shouldn’t be wasting their time puzzling over spelling errors).

As the earlier post explains, stationary and stationery derive from the same Latin root. They parted ways centuries ago, and while at first glance their meanings seem completely unrelated, there’s a logical explanation for how each came about.

As different as the meanings of these two words are, it’s unlikely that you’ll ever have actual confusion over them — this was a first for me. But this unusual case proves that it can, in fact, happen. Good writing (or editing) isn’t always just a matter of spelling, so understanding your words in more depth is extremely helpful.

Posted in Language, Things you should know, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Banished: Words in Exile, 2015 Edition

Once or twice I’ve followed up on the WOTY (Word of the Year) roundup posts with a post describing words people would like to see expunged from the English language forever. As with WOTY lists, these banned lists often tell you a lot more about the people who put them together than the words themselves.

The best (and longest-lived) such “banned words” list is the one put together each year by Lake Superior State University. I didn’t bother covering it last year, partly because I was busy with other things, but partly because it was just too damned cranky and technophobic. Crankiness is always a factor with this type of list, but there’s a fine line between thoughtful negativity and mere bitter griping. So I skipped it. This year, the submitters are back in thoughtful form, so I’m back with a summary.

Click to decide if this is thoughtfully negative or just griping

Posted in Culture, Language, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WOTY (Word of the Year) 2014 — Part 2

Well, they’ve gone and done it. The American Dialect Society (ADS) chose their Word of the Year (WOTY) for 2014 over the weekend. Don’t feel bad if you missed it: there was absolutely no fanfare. (Aside from the ADS press release, this may have been the only story published so far.) If ever a WOTY selection received anemic media coverage, this was it. Not that it was an inherently poor choice, only that it’s difficult for the media to get their heads around something that many people don’t think of as a ‘legitimate word.’

Click for the big reveal (and several smaller ones)

Posted in Culture, Language, Things you should know, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment